The Total Economic Impact™ Of Nasdaq Metrio

Cost Savings And Business Benefits Enabled By Nasdaq Metrio

A Forrester Total Economic Impact™ Study Commissioned By Nasdaq, April 2025

Many organizations must comply with worldwide sustainability regulations and reporting requirements; yet most still use manual, error-prone reporting processes that burden their sustainability teams. Organizations seek technology to automate and centralize reporting workflows, drive business operations decisions, build stakeholder trust, and attract environmental, social, and governance (ESG)-focused investors and capital.1

Nasdaq Metrio provides enterprises with a software-as-a-service (SaaS) platform to collect, measure, disclose, and communicate their investor-grade, audited ESG data. Through automated data collection workflows, KPI-tracking dashboards, and external reporting capabilities, Nasdaq Metrio allows sustainability teams to drive efficiency, attract investors, and engage stakeholders while reducing enterprise risk. Nasdaq’s innovative technology combined with in-house sustainability expertise provides full-service support to organizations navigating global compliance requirements.

Nasdaq commissioned Forrester Consulting to conduct a Total Economic Impact™ (TEI) study and examine the potential return on investment (ROI) enterprises may realize by deploying Nasdaq Metrio.2 The purpose of this study is to provide readers with a framework to evaluate the potential financial impact of Nasdaq Metrio on their organizations.

icon

Return on investment (ROI)

101%

icon

Net present value (NPV)

$249K

To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed four decision-makers with experience using Nasdaq Metrio. For the purposes of this study, Forrester aggregated the interviewees’ experiences and combined the results into a single composite organization that is a global, multibillion-dollar manufacturing organization with operations in North America and the European Union. The publicly traded composite organization has 3,000 employees, five of whom are on the sustainability team.

Prior to investing in Nasdaq Metrio, interviewees explained that their organization’s sustainability teams spent time chasing internal stakeholders for necessary reporting data. Without a centralized system for the data, the sustainability teams then sorted through redundant, incomplete, and untrustworthy data, and spent extra time preparing it in a simple way so executives could set performance-based objectives. This process created extra reviews during the audit and assurance process, resulting in longer timelines for annual report creation and third-party disclosures. Ultimately, it distracted teams from focusing on strategic activities such as addressing investor needs or strategizing sustainability goals.

Interviewees explained how use of Nasdaq Metrio within their organizations scaled as their sustainability management program needs evolved. Organizations gained efficiencies across their ESG journey, from data collection and calculations to third-party data disclosure and reporting to internal and external stakeholder communication. Interviewees explained how key relationships across departments within their organization improved with access to a centralized system of data and how leadership gained a clear view of key performance data for decision-making.

Key Findings

Quantified benefits. Three-year, risk-adjusted present value (PV) quantified benefits for the composite organization include:

  • Automated data collection and measurement. With access to prebuilt templates and backup documentation stored in Nasdaq Metrio, data collectors at the composite organization automate much of the data collection process. Each of the 75 data collectors saves 90% of their time previously required for manual data input. Over three years, this is worth $81,000 to the composite.
  • Automated calculation and analysis. By building its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and water use calculations directly into the Nasdaq Metrio platform, the composite’s sustainability team members save 70% of their time previously dedicated to yearly, manual spreadsheet calculations. Over three years, this is worth $42,000 to the composite.
  • Accelerated data disclosures and reporting. The composite creates an annual sustainability report and discloses against four third parties annually. Nasdaq Metrio allows the composite to autopopulate data across multiple disclosures and accelerates the creation of data tables and design elements. Additionally, the composite uses Sustainable Lens’s gap-analysis feature to more effectively understand each disclosure’s requirements. The sustainability team saves 50% of their time previously dedicated to annual sustainability report creation and 30% of their time on disclosures preparation. Over three years, this is worth $223,000 to the composite.
  • Enhanced audit and assurance reviews. Nasdaq Metrio allows auditors at the composite to simultaneously conduct audits, speeding up their workflows. Additionally, access to a robust audit log and easily accessible backup documentation eliminates the need for manual follow-up with colleagues across departments. The auditors save 70% of their time on these tasks. Over three years, this is worth $22,000 to the composite.
  • Improved stakeholder communication. The composite routinely communicates its measured sustainability data to management, executives, and investors. Real-time, easy-to-interpret dashboards within Nasdaq Metrio allow the sustainability team to save 80% of their time communicating internally on monthly performance updates, 90% of their time answering investor questions, and 75% of their time preparing materials for executive meetings. Over three years, this is worth $128,000 to the composite.

Unquantified benefits. Benefits that provide value for the composite organization but are not quantified for this study include:

  • Improved relationships with cross-functional teams and investors. Nasdaq’s ease of use and predefined processes reduce friction between the sustainability team and data owners. These features also allow the sustainability team to fill in and support their colleagues during absences. Additionally, increased comprehensiveness and interactivity of the annual reports reduces the manual back and forth with investors.
  • Guided the creation of new, internal best practices. Access to peer benchmarking data creates new opportunities and areas of focus as the sustainability team develops and refines its sustainability management program.
  • Improved data visibility drives production cost savings. Real-time, measured production data provides leadership with new insights to make informed business operations decisions, which drive cost savings.
  • Met cybersecurity requirements. Nasdaq Metrio’s SaaS platform meets IT cybersecurity requirements and includes security features such as single sign-on and multifactor authentication for users.
  • Decreased reliance on external consulting resources. Nasdaq Metrio allows sustainability teams to simplify the report creation process and decrease their reliance on external third parties to design and publish annual reports.
  • Improved data quality and accuracy. The sustainability team gains improved trust in the quality of data populated in annual reports because their ESG data is centralized and supported with backup source documentation.

Costs. Three-year, risk-adjusted PV costs for the composite organization include:

  • Nasdaq Metrio fees. The composite organization pays an annual fee of $65,000 for Nasdaq Metrio including access to its Sustainability Data Management (SDM) and Framework Disclosure Management (FDM) capabilities. Over three years, the composite pays $162,000 to Nasdaq.
  • Implementation and ongoing management. The composite organization pays a one-time implementation fee of $15,000 to Nasdaq. Two sustainability team members and one IT team member are involved in initial implementation and platform configuration. SDM implementation lasts six months and FDM implementation lasts two months. Additionally, the two sustainability team members dedicate an hour per week to ongoing platform optimization and meetings with the Nasdaq team. Over three years, this totals $86,000.

The representative interviews and financial analysis found that a composite organization experiences benefits of $497,000 over three years versus costs of $248,000, adding up to a net present value (NPV) of $248,000 and an ROI of 101%.

“The value [of Nasdaq Metrio] is having the data, which is defendable and auditable, in one place and visible to all interested parties.”

Manager, environmental health and safety, manufacturing

Key Statistics

  • icon icon

    Return on investment (ROI)

    101%
  • icon icon

    Benefits PV

    $497K
  • icon icon

    Net present value (NPV)

    $248K
  • icon icon

    Payback

    7 months
  • icon icon
  • icon icon
  • icon icon
  • icon icon

Benefits (Three-Year)

Automated data collection and measurement Automated calculation and analysis Accelerated data disclosure and reporting Enhanced audit and assurance reviews Improved stakeholder communication

TEI Framework And Methodology

From the information provided in the interviews, Forrester constructed a Total Economic Impact™ framework for those organizations considering an investment in Nasdaq Metrio.

The objective of the framework is to identify the cost, benefit, flexibility, and risk factors that affect the investment decision. Forrester took a multistep approach to evaluate the impact that Nasdaq Metrio can have on an organization.

  1. Due Diligence

    Interviewed Nasdaq stakeholders and Forrester analysts to gather data relative to Nasdaq Metrio.

  2. Interviews

    Interviewed four people at organizations using Nasdaq Metrio to obtain data about costs, benefits, and risks.

  3. Composite Organization

    Designed a composite organization based on characteristics of the interviewees’ organizations.

  4. Financial Model Framework

    Constructed a financial model representative of the interviews using the TEI methodology and risk-adjusted the financial model based on issues and concerns of the interviewees.

  5. Case Study

    Employed four fundamental elements of TEI in modeling the investment impact: benefits, costs, flexibility, and risks. Given the increasing sophistication of ROI analyses related to IT investments, Forrester’s TEI methodology provides a complete picture of the total economic impact of purchase decisions. Please see Appendix A for additional information on the TEI methodology.

Disclosures

Readers should be aware of the following:

This study is commissioned by Nasdaq and delivered by Forrester Consulting. It is not meant to be used as a competitive analysis.

Forrester makes no assumptions as to the potential ROI that other organizations will receive. Forrester strongly advises that readers use their own estimates within the framework provided in the study to determine the appropriateness of an investment in Nasdaq Metrio.

Nasdaq reviewed and provided feedback to Forrester, but Forrester maintains editorial control over the study and its findings and does not accept changes to the study that contradict Forrester’s findings or obscure the meaning of the study.

Nasdaq provided the customer names for the interviews but did not participate in the interviews.

Consulting Team:

Sarah Lervold

Maria Kulikova

Interviews

Role Industry Region OperationsAndEmployees Nasdaq Metrio Capabilities Deployed Time Since Initial Deployment
Director of sustainability and shared services Utilities $557 million United States
515
FDM
SDM
Sustainable Lens
4 years
Sustainability reporting lead Chemical manufacturing $8.2 billion Global
24,000
SDM 3 years
Corporate director, energy efficiency Manufacturing $1.8 billion North America
6,000
SDM 7 years
Manager, environmental health and safety Manufacturing $1.1 billion Global
5,000
SDM 3 years

Key Challenges

Prior to the investment in Nasdaq Metrio, most interviewees’ organizations relied on manual processes and record-keeping systems to collect, measure, and disclose their sustainability data. One of the interviewees’ organizations invested in a prior sustainability management software solution but explained that it offered limited functionality and customization as their organization’s ESG needs scaled. Each of the interviewees’ organizations was at a different maturity stage in their sustainability journey. Some focused primarily on preparing their annual sustainability report, while others disclosed data to multiple third-party frameworks to meet investor and business needs. These third-party frameworks included the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP), CEO Water Mandate, Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), Edison Electric Institute, American Gas Association, and the EU’s Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).

The interviewees noted how their organizations struggled with common challenges, including:

  • Decentralized and time-consuming data collection processes. To meet report and disclosure deadlines on time, interviewees explained the constant need to follow-up with their colleagues across various departments who owned sustainability data. This activity created friction between the sustainability team and the rest of the organization and prevented the sustainability team from focusing on important tasks, including answering investor questions and strategizing sustainability goals.

    The sustainability reporting lead at a chemical manufacturing organization said: “As a sustainability team, we didn’t have access to the needed finance and compliance data. It was all in different systems within the company. This meant chasing people for data until the final day that we were able to publish our report. We used to have very challenging interactions [with internal stakeholders] because we didn’t understand each other. What was the current system’s capabilities versus what we needed for reporting?”
  • Redundant, incomplete, and untrustworthy data. Because they tracked and stored data in manual spreadsheets and file-sharing systems, interviewees explained that their sustainability teams did not fully trust the data. This distrust meant that their audit and assurance teams spent extra time on data verification during review cycles prior to disclosing the data, ultimately slowing reporting and disclosure timelines. Some interviewees also explained that due to manual processes and limited team resources, not all their organization’s data was tracked consistently or at all, leaving gaps in their understanding of their sustainability impact.

    The director of sustainability and shared services at a utility company said: “We used to have a folder on [our internal file system] with all backup documentation. Sometimes you’d have the same thing uploaded twice with different numbers on it. … The accuracy made me a bit nervous.”

    The corporate director, energy efficiency at a manufacturing organization shared a similar sentiment: “It was purely manual. [Our spreadsheets] were not covering our entire portfolio of sites. We transitioned to Metrio and expanded to all the sites.”
  • Poor data visualization capabilities. Interviewees stressed the importance of simple and consistent dashboards so executives and internal stakeholders could understand sustainability performance. For the organizations that had data visualization capabilities prior to Nasdaq Metrio, they explained that system limitations often required their sustainability teams to manually prepare the reference data so that stakeholders could digest it easily.

    The director of sustainability and shared services at a utility company said: “The visualizations for graphs were not really useful for us. We’d have to export the data and then make our own graphs in Excel manually. Having a tool with dashboards, graphs, and charts was something we were looking for.”

“Our senior vice president of communications and sustainability wanted the [Nasdaq Metrio] system in place. With board oversight on our sustainability program and goals, visibility for this data has increased dramatically.”

Manager, environmental health and safety, manufacturing

Investment Objectives

The interviewees’ organizations searched for a solution that could:

  • Unify and centralize ESG data.
  • Provide a transparent and detailed audit-tracking log.
  • Track performance against set measurement objectives.
  • Provide a simple dashboard view for stakeholders to use in decision-making.
  • Provide advanced reporting capabilities for executives and investors.
  • Support several mandatory and voluntary frameworks.

After a request for proposal and business case process evaluating multiple vendors, the interviewees’ organization chose Nasdaq Metrio and began deployment. Interviewees mentioned four key reasons for choosing Nadsaq Metrio: the ability to customize and track robust calculations, access to technology that supports current and potential future frameworks, ease of use for all platform users (including subject matter experts, reviewers, approvers, and auditors), and the ability to launch an interactive microsite to share qualitative and quantitative ESG data.

  • The manager, environmental health and safety at a manufacturing organization told Forrester: “We weighed seven systems on the ability of suppliers to meet or exceed requirements, quality and comprehensiveness of solutions and services, operational and technical capabilities, user experience, implementation capabilities, support capabilities, and supplier experience from other people. We [narrowed it down to] the top three. Metrio was one of the top three and ultimately the select sample.”
  • The sustainability reporting lead at a chemical manufacturing organization said: “[Nasdaq] Metrio was the most competitive solution within our budget. The main driver for choosing [Nasdaq] Metrio was having a communication module where an external stakeholder could filter out data and consult a microsite.”
  • The director of sustainability and shared services at a utility company said: “I had to build a business case for why we needed a different tool. We were able to report but were missing some of the functionality and tools of this more robust software.”

“The whole purpose for us investing in Metrio when we started was to help us with scope 3. We were planning on having a science-based, target-initiative-approved reduction target.”

Manager, environmental health and safety, manufacturing

Composite Organization

Based on the interviews, Forrester constructed a TEI framework, a composite company, and an ROI analysis that illustrates the areas financially affected. The composite organization is representative of the interviewees’ organizations, and it is used to present the aggregate financial analysis in the next section. The composite organization has the following characteristics:

Description of composite. The global, multibillion-dollar manufacturing organization has operations in North America and the European Union. The publicly traded composite organization has 3,000 employees and five employees on the sustainability team.

Deployment characteristics. The composite deploys the SDM and FDM capabilities during initial implementation. It also uses the free version of Sustainable Lens3,  Nasdaq’s tool for AI-driven sustainability research and benchmarking.[i] Two of the sustainability team members are power users of Nasdaq Metrio.The composite organization has completed its materiality assessment prior to investing in Nasdaq Metrio to identify sustainability risks and engage stakeholders in the effort.

Key Assumptions
  • Multibillion-dollar manufacturer
  • Operations in North America and the European Union
  • 3,000 employees
  • Five sustainability team members

Total Benefits

Ref. Benefit Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Atr Automated data collection and measurement $32,490 $32,490 $32,490 $97,470 $80,798
Btr Automated calculation and analysis $16,929 $16,929 $16,929 $50,787 $42,100
Ctr Accelerated data disclosures and reporting $89,661 $89,661 $89,661 $268,983 $222,974
Dtr Enhanced audit and assurance reviews $9,097 $9,097 $9,097 $27,292 $22,623
Etr Improved stakeholder communication $51,492 $51,492 $51,492 $154,477 $128,054
  Total benefits (risk-adjusted) $199,670 $199,670 $199,670 $599,009 $496,549

Automated Data Collection And Measurement

Evidence and data. Forrester research states: “Many organizations begin their sustainability journey by setting a baseline and gathering data manually in Excel files. However, you must address sustainability management with as much rigor as financial accounting due to the complexity of data and data sources as well as regulations.”4

Interviewees described data collection as the first step in their organization’s process of preparing an annual sustainability report and third-party disclosures. This step involved interacting with various stakeholders across the organization who owned sets of data, often via email and manual spreadsheets. With Nasdaq Metrio, the organizations unified and automated their data collection processes by using the platform’s prebuilt templates and reference library features. The ability to set role-based permissions within the platform also led to less confusion about data input responsibilities.

  • The director of sustainability and shared services at a utility company said: “The great thing about the tool is that we have 54 users who have the ultimate ownership of the data in the system. It’s not me playing the telephone game. I feel like the accuracy and the quality of the data is much higher because we get data from the right source and the backup documentation is uploaded.”
  • The manager, environmental health and safety at a manufacturing organization said: “Part of our exercise was to develop a greenhouse gas management plan which outlines where the data is and who owns the data. That is the future state now with Metrio and [the Environmental Protection Agency’s] scope 3 [emissions]. It was just a scramble prior to Metrio because those people weren’t identified.”
  • The sustainability reporting lead at a chemical manufacturing organization said: “We engage with environmental, compliance, and cyber teams who have the information to give for the report. They engage with us through material templates. [In the prior environment,] they spent a work week between gathering the information from their systems and sending it to us. With [Nasdaq] Metrio, this is two or three days at most.”
  • The corporate director, energy efficiency at a manufacturing organization said: “The data is the same [as our old process]. But the difference is that we have a reliable source for most of the data input in [Nasdaq Metrio]. The time saving is that we are not questioning the data when we need to do an extraction. It’s not a spreadsheet that people lose track of. It’s more robust.”

Modeling and assumptions. For the financial analysis as applied to the composite organization, Forrester assumes:

  • Data collection and measurement processes involve 75 data collectors.
  • In the prior environment, data collectors spent 40 hours annually inputting data manually. With Nasdaq Metrio, data collectors gain 60% efficiency on this task.
  • The composite recaptures 50% of this work for productive activities.
  • The average fully burdened annual salary for a data collector is $80,000. The fully burdened hourly rate for these professionals is $38.

Risks. The cost of this benefit may vary among organizations depending on:

  • How employees performed each of these activities in the prior environment and the extent.
  • Employees’ salaries.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $81,000.

60%

Efficiencies gained in sustainability data collection processes

Automated Data Collection And Measurement

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
A1 Data collectors Composite 75 75 75
A2 Average annual hours dedicated to data entry per collector in prior environment Interviews 40 40 40
A3 Efficiencies with Nasdaq Metrio Interviews 60% 60% 60%
A4 Fully burdened hourly rate for a data collector Composite $38 $38 $38
A5 Productivity recapture TEI methodology 50% 50% 50%
At Automated data collection and measurement A1*A2*A3*A4*A5 $34,200 $34,200 $34,200
  Risk adjustment ↓5%      
Atr Automated data collection and measurement (risk-adjusted)   $32,490 $32,490 $32,490
Three-year total: $97,470 Three-year present value: $80,798

Automated Calculation And Analysis

Evidence and data. During the initial configuration, interviewees explained that their organizations populated the Nasdaq Metrio platform with custom formulas, which automated the calculation and analysis process for GHG and water measurements. Previously, their sustainability teams used spreadsheets to manually calculate this data each year.

  • The manager, environmental health and safety at a manufacturing organization said, “Prior to [Nasdaq] Metrio, the carbon was essentially calculated by hand on spreadsheets annually. … It really helped to map our scope 3, what the data needs were, and what the necessary inputs were to calculate the emissions.”
  • The corporate director, energy efficiency at a manufacturing organization explained: “We have developed energy GHG and water dashboards. They were originally on spreadsheets. Now we have a platform where each of our sites can enter data monthly and the calculations are built into [Nasdaq] Metrio.”

Modeling and assumptions. For the financial analysis as applied to the composite organization, Forrester assumes:

  • Data calculations involve six team members.
  • In the prior environment, the sustainability team members spent 80 hours each year calculating data manually. With Nasdaq Metrio, the sustainability team gains 90% efficiency on this task.
  • The composite recaptures 75% of the work for productive activities.
  • The average fully burdened annual salary for a sustainability team member is $115,000. The fully burdened hourly rate for these professionals is $55.

Risks. The cost of this benefit may vary among organizations depending on:

  • How employees performed each of these activities in the prior environment and the extent.
  • Employees’ salaries.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $42,000.

90%

Efficiencies gained in data calculation and analysis activities

Automated Calculation And Analysis

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
B1 Team members involved in data calculations Composite 6 6 6
B2 Annual hours dedicated to data calculations per team member in prior environment Composite 80 80 80
B3 Efficiencies with Nasdaq Metrio Composite 90% 90% 90%
B4 Fully burdened hourly rate for a sustainability team member Composite $55 $55 $55
B5 Productivity recapture Composite 75% 75% 75%
Bt Automated calculation and analysis B1*B2*B3*B4*B5 $17,820 $17,820 $17,820
  Risk adjustment ↓5%      
Btr Automated calculation and analysis (risk-adjusted)   $16,929 $16,929 $16,929
Three-year total: $50,787 Three-year present value: $42,100

Accelerated Data Disclosures And Reporting

Evidence and data. Once interviewees’ organizations completed the data collection and calculation process, sustainability teams could create their annual report and disclose against all mandatory and voluntary third-party frameworks. With Nasdaq Metrio, interviewees explained that their organizations could autopopulate data across multiple disclosures, accelerate data table creation and the design process, and more easily update the reports in real time. Organizations configured users’ visual settings within the platform to allow them to focus on the disclosure with the upcoming deadline. One interviewee also explained how Sustainable Lens’s gap-analysis feature allowed their organization to more effectively understand the data to disclose.

  • The director of sustainability and shared services at a utility company said: “[Nasdaq Metrio] does have linkages in the background. If I open CDP, I could see that CDP aligns with SASB. If you answer one question, like scope 1 emissions, and you fill it in once, it fills across all disclosures.”
  • The same interviewee commented: “[With Sustainable Lens,] it’s great to have the instant gap analysis. We had a very low governance score in CDP and other third-party raters. I couldn’t understand why. The day I bought the Sustainable Lens, this was the first thing I checked. It turns out we never actually said that our board had oversight of our targets and goals. I’m thinking we’re going to have a huge jump in some of that scoring by really pinpointing what investors or some of these other rating agencies are really looking at as important. Usually, we have all the data, but we don’t know what to disclose.”
  • The sustainability reporting lead at a chemical manufacturing organization said: “Our focus is on the annual sustainability report. We would spend half of the year on that. We have an early publication date compared to most companies, starting May, June, even July, publishing their annual reports. So we do it early in the year due to investor requests. … Now with Metrio, everyone knows the template perfectly and what they need to provide. We have cut that to three months, basically. Half the time.”
  • The same interviewee said: “It’s the ability to update it in real time. That’s a super plus for us because there are always mistakes. We’re able to correct them as soon as we catch them. For example, if we receive a new request for a specific data point or a sentence that we should include, we just quickly edit that page and that’s it.”

“This tool is very helpful for preparing you to disclose. Nasdaq inputs all of our FDM questions into the report’s online portal. … That’s a huge time saving when we only have three users. I can concentrate on making sure we have all the correct information and that it’s all assured on our end.”

Director of sustainability and shared services, utilities

Modeling and assumptions. For the financial analysis as applied to the composite organization, Forrester assumes:

  • The annual report and disclosures preparation involves two sustainability team members.
  • In the prior environment, the sustainability team members dedicated 1,040 hours annually to creating the annual sustainability report. With Nasdaq Metrio, the sustainability team gains 50% efficiency on this task.
  • The composite prepares four disclosures annually.
  • In the prior environment, the sustainability team members dedicated 520 hours to disclosure preparation. With Nasdaq Metrio, the sustainability team gains 30% efficiency on this task.
  • The composite recaptures 75% of the work for productive activities.
  • The average fully burdened annual salary for a sustainability team member is $115,000. The fully burdened hourly rate for these professionals is $55.

Risks. The cost of this benefit may vary among organizations depending on:

  • The number and type of disclosures and reports prepared annually.
  • The number and type of employees involved in preparation activities.
  • The extent to which each of these activities was performed in the prior environment.
  • Employees’ salaries.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $223,000.

50%

Efficiencies gained in annual sustainability report creation

“I thought there was value in knowing that we’re dealing with somebody that’s approved by CDP.”

Manager, environmental health and safety, manufacturing

Accelerated Data Disclosures And Reporting

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
C1 Sustainability team members involved in annual report and disclosures preparation Composite 2 2 2
C2 Annual hours dedicated to creating annual sustainability report in prior environment Interviews 1,040 1,040 1,040
C3 Efficiencies with Nasdaq Metrio Interviews 50% 50% 50%
C4 Fully burdened hourly rate for a sustainability team member Composite $55 $55 $55
C5 Subtotal: Annual sustainability report efficiencies C1*C2*C3*C4 $57,200 $57,200 $57,200
C6 Disclosures prepared Interviews 4 4 4
C7 Average annual hours dedicated to preparing each disclosure in prior environment Interviews 520 520 520
C8 Efficiencies with Nasdaq Metrio Interviews 30% 30% 30%
C9 Subtotal: Disclosure preparation efficiencies C1*C4*C6*C7*C8 $68,640 $68,640 $68,640
C10 Productivity recapture TEI methodology 75% 75% 75%
Ct Accelerated data disclosures and reporting (C5+C9) *C10 $94,380 $94,380 $94,380
  Risk adjustment ↓5%      
Ctr Accelerated data disclosures and reporting (risk-adjusted)   $89,661 $89,661 $89,661
Three-year total: $268,983 Three-year present value: $222,974

Enhanced Audit And Assurance Reviews

Evidence and data. Beyond the data collectors and sustainability team, interviewees explained that their organizations’ audit teams also gained workflow efficiencies by accessing Nasdaq Metrio. Auditors gained direct access to a unified view of the data and could perform simultaneous reviews rather than waiting for colleagues to finish their work. The robust audit-tracking log and reference library with backup documentation also streamlined their workflows.

  • The director of sustainability and shared services at a utility company estimated that the internal assurance process for their organization prior to Nasdaq Metrio was two weeks, which it shortened to a few days. They said: “Our number one reason we got [Nasdaq Metrio] was for audit and assurance. It offers a very robust tracking of the audit log where you can see exactly who entered what, what was changed, tracking changes on it, year-over-year reporting, some autocalculations that are done there, and then all the tools to approve and review. Being able to load up all the backup documentation and have it stored in the reference library year over year is great.”

Modeling and assumptions. For the financial analysis as applied to the composite organization, Forrester assumes:

  • The annual report and disclosures assurance involves three audit team members.
  • In the prior environment, each audit team member dedicated 160 hours annually to audit work. With Nasdaq Metrio, the audit team gains 70% efficiency on this task.
  • The average fully burdened annual salary for an auditor is $80,000. The fully burdened hourly rate for these professionals is $38.
  • The composite recaptures 75% of this work for productive activities.

Risks. The cost of this benefit may vary among organizations depending on:

  • The number and type of employees involved in audit activities.
  • The extent to which employees performed each of these activities in the prior environment.
  • Employees’ salaries.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $23,000.

70%

Efficiencies gained in sustainability reporting audit work

Enhanced Audit And Assurance Reviews

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
D1 Audit team members involved in annual report and disclosures assurance Composite 3 3 3
D2 Annual hours dedicated to sustainability reporting audit work in prior environment Interviews 160 160 160
D3 Efficiencies with Nasdaq Metrio Interviews 70% 70% 70%
D4 Fully burdened hourly rate for an auditor Composite $38 $38 $38
D5 Productivity recapture TEI methodology 75% 75% 75%
Dt Enhanced audit and assurance reviews D1*D2*D3*D4*D5 $9,576 $9,576 $9,576
  Risk adjustment ↓5%      
Dtr Enhanced audit and assurance reviews (risk-adjusted)   $9,097 $9,097 $9,097
Three-year total: $27,292 Three-year present value: $22,623

Improved Stakeholder Communication

Evidence and data. Forrester research states: “Strong data management and dashboard capabilities help organizations avoid making public statements that put them under the scrutiny of watchdog and government regulations on greenwashing.”5

Interviewees explained multiple ways in which their organizations communicated their collected and measured sustainability data: internally to management, externally to investors, and during executive-level meetings. With access to real-time data, simple and easy-to-interpret dashboards, and improved comprehensiveness of annual reports, sustainability teams saved time during document preparation and when answering investor requests.

  • As it relates to investor communications, the sustainability reporting lead at the chemical manufacturing organization said: “We are always requested to provide further details and breakdowns per our businesses’ performance on decarbonization plans. Now we just go through [Nasdaq] Metrio and find detailed plans per business. Before, it would require a super huge email with investors. What they really want is transparency, and you know an email does not provide transparency.”
  • The same interviewee explained many other communication use cases for the sustainability data: “[We pull data] for the executive teams on very specific inputs, and we have a whole month on ethics training and sustainability as part of that training. We also use the data for onboarding new hires. We are able to [pull from Nasdaq Metrio] rather than having to produce any sort of other resources.”
  • The corporate director, energy efficiency at a manufacturing organization said: “Nasdaq Metrio provides the company with a view of the monthly performance to make projections as objectives and track against these objectives. It gives us the tools to have a reliable picture that we can follow from the executives all the way to the supervisors and at each site. We share performance data results from Nasdaq Metrio with three divisions, totaling roughly 100 people.”
  • The same interviewee said: “Our energy efficiency engineer reports on 12 sites. Every month, this [equates to] a day and a half of validating data and sharing reports. Without [Nadsaq Metrio,] the energy efficiency engineer would spend a week doing this.”

Modeling and assumptions. For the financial analysis as applied to the composite organization, Forrester assumes:

  • The following communication activities involve two sustainability team members: internal monthly performance updates, answering investor communications, and preparing sustainability reports for executive and investor meetings.
  • In the prior environment, the sustainability team members dedicated 480 hours annually to internal monthly updates. With Nasdaq Metrio, the sustainability team gains 80% efficiency on this task.
  • In the prior environment, the sustainability team members dedicated 270 hours annually to answering investor communications. With Nasdaq Metrio, the sustainability team gains 90% efficiency on this task.
  • In the prior environment, the composite dedicated 40 hours to preparing sustainability reports for executive and investor meetings. With Nasdaq Metrio, the sustainability team gains 75% efficiency on this task.
  • The average fully burdened annual salary for a sustainability team member is $115,000. The fully burdened hourly rate for these professionals is $55.
  • The composite recaptures 75% of this work for productive activities.

Risks. The cost of this benefit may vary among organizations depending on:

  • The number and type of employees involved in stakeholder communication activities.
  • The extent to which employees performed each of these activities in the prior environment.
  • Employees’ salaries.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this benefit downward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $128,000.

90%

Efficiencies gained in answering investor communications

Improved Stakeholder Communication

Ref. Metric Source Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
E1 Sustainability team members involved in internal communications Composite 2 2 2
E2 Annual hours dedicated to internal monthly performance updates in prior environment Interviews 480 480 480
E3 Efficiencies with Nasdaq Metrio Interviews 80% 80% 80%
E4 Subtotal: Internal communication efficiencies E1*E2*E3*E11 $42,240 $42,240 $42,240
E5 Annual hours dedicated to answering investor communications in prior environment Interviews 270 270 270
E6 Efficiencies with Nasdaq Metrio Interviews 90% 90% 90%
E7 Subtotal: Investor communication efficiencies E1*E5*E6*E11 $26,730 $26,730 $26,730
E8 Annual hours dedicated to preparing sustainability reports for executive and investor meetings in prior environment Interviews 40 40 40
E9 Efficiencies with Nasdaq Metrio Interviews 75% 75% 75%
E10 Subtotal: Executive meeting preparation efficiencies E1*E8*E9*E11 $3,300 $3,300 $3,300
E11 Fully burdened hourly rate for sustainability team members Composite $55 $55 $55
E12 Productivity recapture TEI methodology 75% 75% 75%
Et Improved stakeholder communication (E4+E7+E10)*E12 $54,203 $54,203 $54,203
  Risk adjustment ↓5%      
Etr Improved stakeholder communication (risk-adjusted)   $51,492 $51,492 $51,492
Three-year total: $154,477 Three-year present value: $128,054

Unquantified Benefits

Interviewees mentioned the following additional benefits that their organizations experienced but were not able to quantify:

  • Improved relationships with cross-functional teams and investors. Interviewees noted that Nasdaq Metrio’s ease of use and templated process reduced friction between their organizations’ sustainability teams and data collectors during the data collection phase. The unified platform also allowed colleagues to easily fill in for others during absences or turnover periods. Additionally, investors could access the data they needed more easily with the improved functionality of the annual sustainability reports. Interviewees commented:
    • The sustainability reporting lead at a chemical manufacturing organization said: “We have smoothed relationships with external stakeholders. We have stopped receiving so many requests throughout the year. Showing investors an interactive page versus a static PDF makes the conversation go farther.” On internal stakeholder relationships, the same interviewee said: “We have mainstreamed our interactions; this has kept those relationships really smooth. Nobody is angry anymore. I would say every single corporate function within our organization engages with us through Metrio.”
    • The director of sustainability and shared services at a utility company said: “Overall user satisfaction for people outside of the sustainability team was huge. As soon as we switched to the [Nasdaq Metrio SDM] tool, and then when we upgraded to the FDM tool, everyone commented, ‘Oh, I love it, it’s so great.’”
    • The corporate director, energy efficiency at a manufacturing organization said: “Since [Nasdaq Metrio] is standardized, one of the big advantages is that when we have turnover or when people are changing position, [the work] is done the same way as before because [everything is] on a platform. There is a person responsible in each of the sites. If they are not there, there’s a backup; if they leave, then there’s a system in place. It’s not a person duty, but a system instead.”
  • Guided the creation of new, internal best practices. Nasdaq Metrio’s benchmarking data creates new opportunities for organizations to structure and enhance their sustainability management programs. The director of sustainability and shared services at a utility company shared the following example: “I made all these different peer groups [within Nasdaq Metrio] that I can benchmark myself against. This is unique because some questions are only utility-related and some are industry-agnostic. We only used to do utility benchmarking in the past. We would never think about comparing ourselves to another industry.”
  • Improved data visibility drives production cost savings. Forrester research states: “Companies that are maturing through an environmental sustainability strategy, especially at operational excellence, realize cost savings — by improving efficiency and reducing consumption of resources.”6

    Real-time, measured production data via Nasdaq Metrio provided leaders with new insight to make business operations decisions. The corporate director, energy efficiency at a manufacturing organization said: “[Nasdaq Metrio] pages provide pictures of the performance every month. We know that doing this prevents us from having long appearances of performance that are not in line with objectives. This performance data is powerful enough that our team can take action, and we can save on our cost of production.”
  • Met cybersecurity requirements. The platform meets IT cybersecurity requirements, which is particularly important since it collects and stores organization-specific, investor-grade data. The director of sustainability and shared services at a utility company said: “There is a single sign-on capability and multifactor authentication available. It’s very secure since only the users in the company can get in and use it.”
  • Decreased reliance on external consulting resources. Interviewees noted that Nasdaq Metrio allowed their organizations’ sustainability teams to simplify the report creation process and rely less on external consultants for design and publishing resources. The director of sustainability and shared services at a utility company said: “Before we’d have to hire an outside service to put reports in [designed] PDFs. We’ve reduced this reliance [with Nasdaq Metrio].”
  • Improved data quality and accuracy. By unifying all ESG data into a centralized system and storing backup documentation with the source of all data, interviewees noted that their sustainability team members gained improved trust in the quality of data populated into annual reports.

Flexibility

The value of flexibility is unique to each customer. There are multiple scenarios in which a customer might implement Nasdaq Metrio and later realize additional uses and business opportunities, including:

  • Exploring new features and expanding access across more users. Interviewees shared anticipation for upcoming platform features including automatic user tagging. They also explained how more users could gain value from the platform as their organizations considered new data to track and measure. The corporate director, energy efficiency at a manufacturing organization said, “We have more and more requests for real-time reports [on GHG and water use].”

“The Nasdaq team is always thinking about improvements. They continually roll out a lot of user-friendly features.”

Director of sustainability and shared services, utilities

  • Being better prepared for future regulatory changes. Nasdaq Metrio’s data mapping feature and stored database of industry-specific benchmarking data allows organizations to react and respond quicker to future disclosures. The director of sustainability and shared services at a utility company said: “We’re better prepared for potential regulatory changes that may come our way because we can research them and see what other companies are doing related to X, Y, and Z. I can use their guided prompt, which tells you step by step how to get ready and what overlap there is with what we currently report.”
  • Finalizing API connections and investing in Sustainable Lens to drive further workflow efficiencies. Some of the interviewees’ organizations were in the process of implementing API connections to create additional time savings for their sustainability teams. The sustainability reporting lead at a chemical manufacturer estimated it would eliminate all the time in the first step of data collection. Additionally, interviewees expressed excitement for AI automation with Sustainable Lens for additional benchmarking and report readiness insights.

“We’re continuously evolving the ability to improve our reporting. In our plan, we will be calculating our fugitive gas emissions from our methane pipeline in the system.”

Director of sustainability and shared services, utilities

Flexibility would also be quantified when evaluated as part of a specific project (described in more detail in Appendix A).

Total Costs

Ref. Cost Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Ftr Nasdaq fees $0 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000 $195,000 $161,645
Gtr Implementation and ongoing management $71,048 $6,006 $6,006 $6,006 $89,066 $85,984
  Total costs (risk-adjusted) $71,048 $71,006 $71,006 $71,006 $284,066 $247,629

Nasdaq Fees

Evidence and data. The interviewees paid Nasdaq an annual fee for access to the Nasdaq Metrio platform. This fee varied depending on which modules they deployed.

Modeling and assumptions. Based on the interviews, Forrester assumes the following about the composite organization:

  • The composite pays an average of $65,000 depending on its exact configuration and whether it implements SDM and FDM capabilities. The platform supports all major global regulatory and voluntary standards frameworks to meet reporting requirements of investors, regulators, and other stakeholders across jurisdictions. These standards, backed by an expert team, include: CSRD, ISSB, Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), SASB, Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), CDP, and S&P Corporate Sustainability Assessment, among others. Nasdaq Metrio also supports scalable carbon accounting management for EPA scope 1, 2, and 3 GHG emissions reporting.
  • Pricing may vary. Contact Nasdaq for additional details.

Risks. This cost may vary among organizations depending on:

  • Modules deployed.
  • Any custom configurations.
  • Any negotiated discounts.

Results. Forrester assumes a 0% risk adjustment for this cost, yielding a three-year total PV (discounted at 10%) of $162,000.

Nasdaq Fees

Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
F1 Nasdaq Metrio fees Nasdaq   $65,000 $65,000 $65,000
Ft Nasdaq fees F1 $0 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000
  Risk adjustment 0%        
Ftr Nasdaq fees   $0 $65,000 $65,000 $65,000
Three-year total: $195,000 Three-year present value: $161,645

Implementation And Ongoing Management

Evidence and data. Interviewees commented that implementation for Nasdaq Metrio involved their organizations’ sustainability teams, IT colleagues, and data owners. This phase included a series of training sessions, discussions around KPIs and data to include in the platform, emissions calculations, and user configurations (owner, approver, reviewer, auditor). SDM involved more customization than FDM and therefore took longer to launch.

  • The director of sustainability and shared services at a utility company said: “The FDM [module] was very quick. A couple of months, we had maybe one meeting a week, two or three training sessions that were an hour in total each time. … SDM is a little bit longer because the tool is so customized that you can build whatever you want.”
  • The sustainability reporting lead at a chemical manufacturing organization said: “Implementation was a six- to nine-month process. It was really smooth. It was an added value that the implementation was completed with [the Nasdaq team].”

Modeling and assumptions. For the financial analysis as applied to the composite organization, Forrester assumes:

  • The composite pays $15,000 in implementation fees to Nasdaq, which includes product deployment, user setup, metadata configuration (customer sites, frameworks), product overview, and training.
  • Implementation involves two sustainability team members and one IT team member. Over the course of implementation, the sustainability team members are dedicated 30% of the time and the IT team member is dedicated 10%.
  • It takes six months to implement and customize the SDM capability.
  • It takes two months to implement the FDM capability.
  • The average fully burdened monthly salary of a sustainability team member is $8,333.
  • The average fully burdened monthly salary of an IT team member is $9,583.
  • Each sustainability team member dedicates 1 hour per week optimizing and configuring the Nasdaq Metrio platform on an ongoing basis.

Risks. This cost may vary among organizations depending on:

  • The level of implementation support provided by Nasdaq.
  • Employees involved in implementation and ongoing management and the extent to which each are involved during these periods.
  • Employees’ salaries.
  • Whether the organization completes its materiality assessment prior to the investment in Nasdaq Metrio.

Results. To account for these risks, Forrester adjusted this cost upward by 5%, yielding a three-year, risk-adjusted total PV (discounted at 10%) of $86,000.

Implementation And Ongoing Management

Ref. Metric Source Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
G1 Nasdaq Metrio implementation fee Nasdaq $15,000      
G2 Sustainability team members Composite 2 2 2 2
G3 IT team members Composite 1      
G4 Months dedicated to implementation for SDM Interviews 6      
G5 Months dedicated to implementation for FDM Interviews 2      
G6 Average percentage of time for sustainability team Composite 30%      
G7 Average percentage of time for IT team Composite 10%      
G8 Fully burdened monthly salary for a sustainability team member Composite $9,583      
G9 Fully burdened monthly salary for an IT team member Composite $8,333      
G10 Subtotal: Implementation G1+(G2*(G4+G5)*G6*G8))+(G3*(G4+G5) *G7*G9)) $67,665      
G11 Hours dedicated to ongoing platform management Interviews   52 52 52
G12 Fully burdened hourly rate for a sustainability team member Composite   $55 $55 $55
G13 Subtotal: Ongoing management G2*G11*G12   $5,720 $5,720 $5,720
Gt Implementation and ongoing management G10+G13 $67,665 $5,720 $5,720 $5,720
  Risk adjustment ↑5%        
Gtr Implementation and ongoing management (risk-adjusted)   $71,048 $6,006 $6,006 $6,006
Three-year total: $89,066 Three-year present value: $85,984

Cash Flow Chart (Risk-Adjusted)

Total costs Total benefits Cumulative net benefits Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
  • icon

    The financial results calculated in the Benefits and Costs sections can be used to determine the ROI, NPV, and payback period for the composite organization’s investment. Forrester assumes a yearly discount rate of 10% for this analysis.

These risk-adjusted ROI, NPV, and payback period values are determined by applying risk-adjustment factors to the unadjusted results in each Benefit and Cost section.

Cash Flow Analysis (Risk-Adjusted Estimates)

   Initial Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total Present Value
Total costs ($71,048) ($71,006) ($71,006) ($71,006) ($284,066) ($247,629)
Total benefits $0 $199,670 $199,670 $199,670 $599,009 $496,549
Net benefits ($71,048) $128,664 $128,664 $128,664 $314,943 $248,920
ROI          
Payback          

Appendix A: Total Economic Impact

Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

Total Economic Impact Approach

  • icon

    Benefits represent the value the solution delivers to the business. The TEI methodology places equal weight on the measure of benefits and costs, allowing for a full examination of the solution’s effect on the entire organization.

  • icon

    Costs comprise all expenses necessary to deliver the proposed value, or benefits, of the solution. The methodology captures implementation and ongoing costs associated with the solution.

  • icon

    Flexibility represents the strategic value that can be obtained for some future additional investment building on top of the initial investment already made. The ability to capture that benefit has a PV that can be estimated.

  • icon

    Risks measure the uncertainty of benefit and cost estimates given: 1) the likelihood that estimates will meet original projections and 2) the likelihood that estimates will be tracked over time. TEI risk factors are based on “triangular distribution.”

  • icon
    PRESENT VALUE (PV)

    The present or current value of (discounted) cost and benefit estimates given at an interest rate (the discount rate). The PV of costs and benefits feed into the total NPV of cash flows.

  • icon
    NET PRESENT VALUE (NPV)

    The present or current value of (discounted) future net cash flows given an interest rate (the discount rate). A positive project NPV normally indicates that the investment should be made unless other projects have higher NPVs.

  • icon
    RETURN ON INVESTMENT (ROI)

    A project’s expected return in percentage terms. ROI is calculated by dividing net benefits (benefits less costs) by costs.

  • icon
    DISCOUNT RATE

    The interest rate used in cash flow analysis to take into account the time value of money. Organizations typically use discount rates between 8% and 16%.

  • icon
    PAYBACK PERIOD

    The breakeven point for an investment. This is the point in time at which net benefits (benefits minus costs) equal initial investment or cost.

The initial investment column contains costs incurred at “time 0” or at the beginning of Year 1 that are not discounted. All other cash flows are discounted using the discount rate at the end of the year. PV calculations are calculated for each total cost and benefit estimate. NPV calculations in the summary tables are the sum of the initial investment and the discounted cash flows in each year. Sums and present value calculations of the Total Benefits, Total Costs, and Cash Flow tables may not exactly add up, as some rounding may occur.

Appendix B: Supplemental Material

Related Forrester Research

The State of Environmental Sustainability Business Priorities, 2025, Forrester Research, Inc., February 3, 2025.

Appendix C: Endnotes

1 Source: The State of Sustainability Management Software, 2024, Forrester Research Inc., February 20, 2025.

2 Total Economic Impact is a methodology developed by Forrester Research that enhances a company’s technology decision-making processes and assists solution providers in communicating their value proposition to clients. The TEI methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of business and technology initiatives to both senior management and other key stakeholders.

3 Learn more about this product here: www.nasdaq.com/solutions/sustainability/sustainable-lens.

4 Source: Buyer’s Guide: Sustainability Management Software, 2024, Forrester Research Inc., July 15, 2024.

5 Source: The State of Sustainability Management Software, 2024, Forrester Research Inc., February 20, 2025.

6 Source: Predictions 2025: Environmental Sustainability, Forrester Research Inc., October 24, 2024.

M
K